Background: After the lockdown, now the economic activities have started in a small way and at the outset, agricultural activities have been gaining momentum and Self Help Group members have started going to work. Govt also has opened up the opportunities under MNREGA. The demand for credit will go up from the SHG members in the days ahead. As the banks have to operate the processes in a new normal situation, SHG bank credit linkage program needs to be revisited and Self Help Group members should be trained to shift to digital mode in terms of all processes like Virtual SHG meetings, Virtual ratings, repayment through digital means and so on. Under this context, this new concept of Digital SHG 2.0 framework was developed and shared with the bankers. Suggestions have been made to build a supportive eco-system so that non-credit support services also will be made available to the banks, which will enable them to increase the credit flow to the SHGs.
-
Objectives of the Digital SHG 2.0:
- To retain the core work with the bank and to delegate other works to the people / institutions in the eco system.
- To make the model shift from high touch to low touch model to adapt to post COVID scenarios.
- To digitize the part of processes, so that turn-around time from application to cash disbursal to the SHG women should happen within 6 working days.
- To optimize the value realization from each satisfied SHG women client by moving them up the ladder with bank’s other mainstream products.
- To strengthen the non-credit services support to boost the credit needs from the demand side.
-
Digital SHG 2.0 Framework:
|
Sl.no |
Challenges / barriers in the existing system. |
New processes under SHG 2.0. |
|
a |
Non-core works delegation: |
|
|
1 |
Delegating non-core works: The Branch managers need to spend a lot of time in sourcing the SHG applications, processing them and disbursing the loans as they do not have the last mile connectivity like MFIs to reach out to the people. |
|
|
2 |
Facilitation fee: No uniform system is at present to compensate the time and efforts of the intermediaries. |
|
|
3 |
Due diligence: The proposed intermediaries have some inherent risks in each of the model. There should be a proper due diligence system. The present due diligence formats mostly give weightage to the financial parameters, whereas social parameters also equally important. |
|
|
4 |
FLDG (First Loss Default Guarantee): As the bank is delegating its main functions, there should be a mechanism to improve the accountability of the intermediaries, which is lacking now. |
|
|
b |
Shift to Low-touch model: |
|
|
5 |
Reinventing the model: Now, lending to SHGs involve a high touch model with more frequent face to face contacts and group meetings. But, in the post COVID scenarios, as we need to follow the social distancing norms, we need to reinvent our model. |
Office-bearers of the SHGs (Animators and representatives) and the field staff of the intermediaries should be trained on using the virtual meetings apps through their mobile phones.
|
|
c |
Digitization of the processes: |
|
|
6 |
Turn Around Time: MFIs even though charge around 20 to 24% interest, they win over the SHG members as their TAT is low, which may range from 3 to 5 days. In general, banks take 3 to 6 months for disposing the SHG loan applications. In some branches, when the branch managers are interested in SHG financing, they disburse the loans within a week to fortnight. Hence, there is a good scope banks to reduce the TAT. |
Head office and Zonal offices of banks should put in place a system to monitor the flow of SHG applications at the branch level and give an alert to the branches, if the branches are not following the TAT of 6 working days. To ensure the TAT becomes a reality, all the processes right from on-boarding of customers should be re-visited and revamped to overcome the challenges of post-COVID scenarios as well. |
|
7 |
Blended system: Now, SHG financing involves lot of paper-work, which takes more time. This can be reduced by introducing the digitization of processes. E.g. On-boarding of SHG member-wise details including KYC documents in a tablet by intermediaries. Paper work to be minimized to the barest minimum. Another major problem faced in the sector is the multiple memberships in SHGs and JLGs by members against the RBI’s regulation of one member should be in one SHG or JLG. As there is no system to check this, the members get enrolled in different SHGs promoted by Banks and MFIs or NGOs and take loans from multiple sources beyond their capacity leading to over indebtedness. Hence, there is a need to develop a robust system to register all SHGs and JLGs at the district level so that they will be identified with unique IDs and this unique ID of SHGs/JLGs to play a role like AADHAAR ID played a helpful role to remove the ghost accounts and helped to save a lot of money through DBT (Direct Benefit Transfer). |
Digitalization of SHG enrolment process: Member-wise data to be digitized. Now, banks have only SHG level information. Now, banks have to move to capture the member level data to use the Big data analysis. Field staff of intermediaries can be trained to handle the tablets and they can enter the data and banks will verify online and approve the on-boarding. Unique ID for SHGs/JLGs at district level: Registration of all SHGs and JLG irrespective of whether they are promoted by NRLM or NULM or MFI or NGO or other Govt project, should be made compulsory. NABARD should come out with a software to capture this data through their DDMs offices in each district. Each SHG/JLG with their member level data and ID proofs should enter the data in the system. This will avoid the dual membership of members in Bank and MFI programs. The system should remove the members having membership in more than one group, using the ID proofs matching. Banks and MFIs should give loans only to the groups which have registered themselves at the district office and taken an unique ID for them. |
|
8 |
Lending Processes: Now, branches are taking so many formats, which have been prescribed some two decades age, which was necessary during the initial stages of evolution of SHGs. But, now the rationalization of forms & documents have to be taken up, as it takes up more time, which delays the TAT. |
|
|
9 |
MIS on SHG lending: At present, the branches have only very limited data on SHG lending. Hence, they are not able to analyze further down to fix the issues related to their portfolio. The data tracked now is applications received, sanctioned no and amount, disbursed no and amount, loan outstanding and repayment collections. |
|
|
d |
Client Value Optimization: |
|
|
10 |
Product innovations: Banks now mostly offer vanilla products like Basic SHG loans. Very few branches only offer other specialized loan products for SHGs. There is a good scope for increasing the lending as the credit needs of the target groups are varied and multifold. The potential demand estimated for microfinance is Rs.8.86 lakh crore, where the supply during the financial year 2018-19 was only Rs.2.13 lakh crore, which is only 24% of the total potential demand. |
Banks to offer multiple loan products to the targeted groups to cater to the varied needs of the SHG members.
|
Proposed Non-Credit Services Support
RSETI will be provided with a Young Professional to assist the Director on this exclusive REN and other outreach programs to these entrepreneurs.
I hope with the above structural changes in the Digital SHG 2.0, the branch managers will come forward to lend to the SHGs, as they have a back-up system for follow up of clients.
